90
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

There are actually people out there willing to live totally off the grid, no electricity or nothing. I have respect for people that have the nerve and the skill to do such things, but in most areas you're legally required to have electricity.

Like WTF? Once upon a time, electricity basically didn't exist (well it did, but humans weren't generating it). Then it became a neat invention for the rich. Then it became a convenience. Then it became mandatory...

Seriously, how are we ever going to have options when energy is literally forced upon us?

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Electricity is essential to decarbonization. Do you have any idea how destructive it would be for billions of humans to go live in the woods? Most people would starve or freeze to death, but if that didn't happen then the trees would be gone within a generation.

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

'Electricity is essential...'

No it's not, it never was. We've just become dependent upon it, unfortunately including myself.

Somehow humans lived for over 100,000 years without electricity just fine. Now within the past 200 years we done cranked the energy consumption up by an order or three of magnitude, and sit with our thumbs up our butts and wonder what's wrong.

We are what's wrong, humans (yes I'll include myself in this criticism) are a cancer on this planet. Even if we move to Mars, we'll still be a cancer. We're a nasty trashy species that has barely even set foot on the moon, but somehow we already got over 100 bags of human waste on the moon.

Electricity isn't the answer, it's the problem.

Space isn't the answer, it'll be our folly.

Our planet means more to us than $$$...

[-] p1mrx@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Now within the past 200 years we done cranked the energy consumption up by an order or three of magnitude

I agree that reducing the human population by a few orders of magnitude would make it possible to live off the land, use less energy, and protect the environment. Are you volunteering to be among the billions who die?

[-] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm too stubborn to die. I'll wait until the cancer kicks in.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
90 points (97.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5246 readers
441 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS