819
Apple donation (lemmy.basedcount.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 year ago

And yet it is still a prevalent idea in FOSS that open sourcing without restrictions on corporate use will karma back to you positively somehow.

Non-corporate FOSS should be way more popular.

[-] StarkillerX42@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not corporate FOSS that's the problem here, it's the BSD license. If BSD had a stronger license, Apple would be forced to give more back.

[-] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree it's the BSD license. That's what I mean. It's a license that places no restriction on corporate use without contribution.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The BSD argument (that I don't necessarily agree with) is that a less permissive license would encourage companies to use a different solution or build their own. I suppose this at least guarantees them a few $1000 a year depending on apple employee donations.

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, Linux is much less permissive to the Apple/Sony strategy of forking BSD and closing the source, and it's way more popular in every industry

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
819 points (95.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

32453 readers
686 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS