this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
637 points (98.0% liked)

Risa

7131 readers
162 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doug@midwest.social 81 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Little bothered that Tim Russ said "bias" instead of "biased"

[–] TeaHands@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not mad I'm just disappointment.

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Thassodar@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

Son. I am dissapoint.

[–] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not anger. I'm disappointment.

[–] Opafi@feddit.de 23 points 2 years ago

I hope somebody replied with "hi bias, I'm dad"

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, you see he is the literal human embodiment of the concept of bias and was letting us know. The other tweets are unrelated

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 9 points 2 years ago

It's true, that's why his role as Tuvok was so impressive. The exact opposite of type casting

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

I'm a little bias short and stout, here is my handle here is my spout

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

A peeve of mine is the term “pet peeve”. 😅

If something bothers you so, why the fuck would you keep, nurture, and tend to it as a pet?

I propose it change to haunting peeve, because you don’t want it, can’t get rid of it, and it exists regardless if you think about it or not.

😁 (I’m not super serious about this, but “pet peeve” really does low-key bother me)

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Omg you are an actual person. Every time I see your username under a post I, for whatever reason, think it’s the community name.

I’ve seen a lot of your posts I think 😅 thanks for what you do! 🫡

(No it didn’t register that I replied to you until I went back to look.. I don’t really -see- usernames)

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am, and thanks! Beep boop, I like sharing memes. Just doing my part to help Lemmy grow.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I like that you like sharing memes, because I’ve come across them enough to think you are a community unto yourself.

I like sorting by new to report garbage and interact with things that would otherwise die, also to help Lemmy grow! It’s lonely in new but… i get to report a lot of weird stuff.. so there’s that 🫠

Thank you for your service, soldier. That's the kind of stuff Lemmy needs!

[–] GreenTeaRedFlag@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

it's actually short for petite peeve, because it's something small and unimportant. Or maybe it's not, but you don't know.

[–] ElHexo@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's partly a joke (your favourite peeve, for example) and probably a reference to the other, now archaic, meaning of pet:

fit of peevishness, offense or ill-humor at feeling slighted

I think you can accept idioms as they are or you'll be endlessly feeling like one saying or another has got your goat

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

You must have missed the part that says I’m not really serious.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

They separated Tuvix on the bias and Tim got more of him.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I've noticed that grammar error a lot on the Internet. Bias is discussed frequently as a topic of popular rage-bait posts.

FYI for those people: "bias" is a noun that is the thing, and "biased" is an adjective that describes a person who has the bias. "The biased person showed their bias" for example.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago

It's definitely one of the more common ones. I see that alot

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

Autocorrect ducks for us all.

[–] CeruleanRuin 3 points 2 years ago

For people over a certain age I always assume they're using text to speech and don't worry about going back and correcting it. My wife is somehow always talking to someone else in the room while she dictates to her watch, so I have a lot of fun interpreting her texts.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you understand someone well enough to correct them, you didn't have to.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn't mean everyone else will

Just because you understand them well enough today doesn't mean you will tomorrow

We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just because you understand someone well enough to correct them doesn't mean everyone else will

Then they should ask for clarification.

Just because you understand them well enough today doesn't mean you will tomorrow

At which point you can ask for clarification.

We should all be striving to be better than we are, not breeding resentment from contentment

And part of "better" is having the perspective and desire to avoid pedantry where it's not needed.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago

We're clearly not going to agree here. Plenty of people would rather be made aware of their mistakes and that's no less valid than your point of view. Personally I would rather avoid potential misunderstandings than deal with them after the fact. I'm not the only one who feels that way.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just because ... doesn't mean ...

I hate this extragrammatical idiom so much.

But given that colloquial usage trumps all else when it comes to driving the evolution of language, most people could care less.

[–] Doug@midwest.social 1 points 2 years ago

Interesting choice given the way that's been shifting slowly back to the more accurate form in the past however many years.

If colloquial usage did trump all, irregardless would've been acknowledged as a correct word well before I was born. It may be the driving force but it's hardly the only, or even constantly deciding, factor

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, what's the deal with that. Yes, the two sound similar, but saying "I'm bias" is like saying "I'm anger" instead of "I'm angry" or "I'm sadness" instead of "I'm sad".

[–] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago

It's like the "would of" people. They don't hear it in speech so they type it how it sounds to them.

Or it's autocorrect

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

only because it makes him look like he learned to read on tumblr

[–] Doug@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or X(Twitter) or Reddit or Facebook or.............

Tumblr is an offender but let's not pretend it's the only one

[–] theodewere@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Doug@midwest.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems like it's a bit of a sensitive spot for you...

[–] theodewere@kbin.social -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

stupidity absolutely is, every time i encounter it

[–] Doug@midwest.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So like on Twitter and Reddit and Tumblr and Facebook and........

[–] theodewere@kbin.social -4 points 2 years ago

take your hokey religion someplace else, son this street corner is taken