262
submitted 1 year ago by El_Dorado@beehaw.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mrmojo@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1 line below, you can read

Tech companies have said scanning messages and end-to-end encryption are fundamentally incompatible. Earlier this month, junior minister Stephen Parkinson appeared to concede ground, saying in parliament's upper chamber that Ofcom would only require them to scan content where "technically feasible". Donelan said in response to questions about Parkinson's statement that further work to develop the technology was needed but government-funded research had shown it was possible.

In practice, I doubt this will have any consequence on encryption, as the title of this post suggests.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Backdoors make it "technically feasible" to scan "e2ee". See, it's all a matter of perspective.

[-] Zelet@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Fucking doublespeak (not you). If you can scan it then it isn’t e2ee. Words mean things. E2ee means that the two parties are the only two who can read the message. If there is a way to do any analysis on the message at all then it isn’t e2ee.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

But they're not mandating such backdoors it seems.

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
262 points (96.5% liked)

Privacy

32177 readers
343 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS