256
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
256 points (98.5% liked)
politics
19107 readers
3068 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I read the indictment. They have text messages, they found envelopes with the DNA of one of the bribers in his house.
He Googled "how much does a kilo of gold cost" before accepting a bar of gold (whose serial number linked it to another briber), then phoned a state investigative agency to try to get a case dismissed, after which he went to have a celebratory dinner with the bribers (photo of them toasting each other with champagne).
He emailed an Egyptian national the breakdown of the US embassy staff in Cairo, and used his hold power over military exports to extract bribes.
They tried to delete these texts and emails. It goes on and on.
MAYBE it's not technically illegal somehow or Clarence Thomas will spring him, but he absolutely does not belong in the Senate. This is not one photo, this is a very solid case of abuse of position and Chuck Schumer defending him is pathetic.
If you're in the US, Call your Senators (particularly the Ds) and tell em to put it up for an expulsion vote. He's gotta go. Now.
On the other hand, I think it's noteworthy that "Senior Government Official Caught Accepting Gold Bars to Affect Policy Towards Egypt" could have been a news item, unchanged, 4000 years ago in Babylon. So that's something.