555

USB inventor explains why the connector was not designed to be reversible (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ooli@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

229 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] florge@feddit.uk 32 points 1 year ago

Making USB reversible to begin with would have necessitated twice as many wires and twice as many circuits, and would have doubled the cost. Bhatt says his team was aware at the time of the frustration that a rectangular design could have, versus a round connector. But in an effort to keep it as cheap as possible, the decision was made to go with a design that, in theory, would give users a 50/50 chance of plugging it in correctly (you can up the odds by looking at the inside first, or identifying the logo).

[-] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 19 points 1 year ago

I was there when we had lots of "round" connectors like Din connectors but also lots of proprietary ones.

That was way worse, trying for the eleventh time to put it in correctly without looking as it's under/on the backside in a jungle of other cables, and not damaging any of the fragile 7 pins... gargl.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The trick with DIN connectors was to try to insert them gently while rotating them. Once you got the notch lined up they would very clearly drop into the socket at which point you could apply more pressure to fully seat them. It was only a problem if you were jamming them in full force while rotating because you could exert enough pressure to force it into the socket even with the key notch misaligned crushing the pins. I never once had a problem inserting a DIN connector, something I absolutely can't say about USB-A.

[-] florge@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Wow I'd forgotten about the old keyboard and mouse ports, they were such a faff to plug in without looking.

[-] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

would give users a 50/50 chance of plugging it in correctly

Sometimes it's more 33% or even 10%.

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I have my doubts. I think that a jack-like (circular) connector wouldn't require twice as many wires and circuits. Actually absolutely the same amount. The connector itself would require more metal to make.

And the chance of correctly plugging that in would be like 99/100 (1/100 for breaking it).

this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023

555 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59654 readers

2686 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS