39
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by pdxfed@lemmy.world to c/running@lemmy.world

For most folks, once they're semi-regular runners, cost and turnover of shoes becomes a factor.

Running has an entire spectrum of needs, personally If Nike is shocked $75-$80(mid $50s after discount https://www.nike.com/w/mens-running-shoes-37v7jznik1zy7ok?sort=priceAsc) isn't competitive with pricing for other brands (Asics and New Balance are easily had for mid-$30s on sale) then I have a bridge to sell them. I(with most people) are not training for Boston, and don't want or need whatever bullshit is sold along with 2-20x the price tag for a pair of shoes to sweat in.

Feigning surprise their incredibly expensive pricing which pushed away the top of their marketing funnel impacts the middle and end of their funnel should be shame on their marketing and analytics team. That goes for any sport, their shit is overpriced and I couldn't give a shit about their brand.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

Even if they were cheap it wouldn't make the shoes good. Nike make some of the worst fitting shoes when it comes to my feet.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
39 points (91.5% liked)

Running

2562 readers
12 users here now

A place for runners.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS