143
submitted 1 year ago by iraq_lobster@lemm.ee to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

This is why we can’t have nice things!

[-] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

well african people get accessible internet, at the expense of scientific research. which one would be more relevant to humanity? one might ask..

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

But how much of the internet in Africa is actually served by Starlink?

Africa is a massive continent with a wealth of countries with varying demographics, it’s no wonder that they have a 40% internet penetration rate compared to the world average 60%.

I don’t think Starlink is going to change that.

[-] iraq_lobster@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yea, after much thought, i doubt starlink to be yet profitable in africa

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I hope it stays that way. Africa doesn’t need more greedy white billionaires leeching from them.

[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Why does it have to be “profitable”??

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

It's not just developing nations, even developed nations have areas people live that aren't viable to run fibre connections to.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
143 points (96.7% liked)

Science

13013 readers
47 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS