1353
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CeeBee@lemmy.world 137 points 1 year ago

This case shows they’re doing precisely the opposite,” said Roth, who said the abuses Caswell endured were tantamount to “torture”.

No, it was full-blown torture. There's no room for interpretation here.

Women across the country have increasingly been jailed for pregnancy outcomes, including miscarriages and stillbirths.

Geez. I don't even know what to say. Miscarriages are way more common than people realize. In fact, it's possible that miscarriages out number full-term pregnancies. There are so many NORMAL biological factors that could trigger a miscarriage.

It's an incredibly complex and nuanced field of biology, and this simplistic mindset of "miscarriage means bad woman" is both disturbing and alarming.

[-] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago

I've read estimates that miscarriages make up as much as 75% of all pregnancies, but many are early so women just think their period was late.

[-] CeeBee@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ya, I was going to mention that also, but I didn't want to write too much in my comment.

Edit: I mean about the late period thing. It's incredibly common.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Off topic but which country and what demographic ?

[-] bufordt@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

Earth and human.

The high rate comes from estimating the number of miscarriages that happen in the first 6 weeks, often before someone knows they are pregnant and the miscarriage is dismissed as a heavy or late period.

The traditional miscarriage stat comes from only looking at known pregnancies, and even it is likely higher than most people realize.

Regardless which stat you use, miscarriages are way more common than most people think.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I see so mothers of age 20-30yrs in Germany have same chance of miscarriage as 50-60 years olds North Korean mothers, that is 75%. Since evidently demographics doesn't matter.

Now seriously, why i asked that: No source stated. Every age, country etc has this ratio different. Some countries have problem due to late pregnancies (35+yrs) due their culture. Other have trouble because of malnutrition. Some have better conditions.

So before i take number as fact and start to spread it as such, i want to know it's a fact or at least narrow it down to the demographics and possibly the source.

Otherwise tomorrow there will be new expert say it's actually 1% or 99% and according to this logic we would have to update our knowledge every-time.

[-] bufordt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

You missed the whole point. We don't have good statistics from miscarriages, because everyone counts the numbers differently, and when you add in the fact that some people don't really realize they've had a miscarriage, you have a very nebulous stat.

The point is that certainly miscarriages are more common than most people think, and likely even more common than that.

My comment was not to prove that their stat was correct, but to explain why the stat varies so much. Your comment about demographics, although I'm sure it was meant innocently, can be taken as looking to blame a certain demographic for doing something wrong that causes their miscarriage numbers to be higher.

[-] greenmarty@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I have not disproved the part that say unknown percentage of miscarriages takes place. It's logical.

However if someone places exact number, it should be based on aomething. If the number has no base, as such it has no value l, at least for me.

As for second part about hatespeech accusations.
I don't see how statistics can blame someone for doing something wrong .
To me the logic is vise versa. If some demographic group is not doing so well or is doing very well. It will be reflected in statistics if measured. If given source stats can be compared and differences in measurement methods reduced or highlighted.

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

We had three before we brought my son to term.

[-] CeeBee@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Sorry to hear that. We were in a similar situation. It's rough. My wife still breaks down emotionally on the projected delivery date of the first one we lost. All the what could have beens. 😭

I do think about it every so often, the only reason I don't get as emotional is because I have terrible memory for remembering specific dates. Took me almost 10 years to get my wife's birthday right. Still get it wrong sometimes.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

A lot of miscarriages happen because something is wrong with the fetus. The "what might have been" would likely have been a lower quality of life than anyone deserves.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

In their minds, women have one job. And if the baby dies, then the girl obviously did a bad job.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I've never heard of it, but now I'm disturbed and alarmed about the people who hold that opinion.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but god and Jesus and stuff, let’s punish women because we believe in Bronze Age myths.

[-] WaterChi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Iron age. You can be dismissive but at least be accurate

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The books are from the Iron Age, the myths are from the Bronze Age.

[-] LostWon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Actually, even in Bronze Age myths, life begins when the baby takes its first breath. If anyone wants, you can listen to an in-depth (and often very funny) discussion on Data Over Dogma's "Abortion and the Bible" episode here.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, but we still need to punish women for having sex. (Genesis 38:24, Leviticus 20:10, Deuteronomy 22:21, Leviticus 19:20, Deuteronomy 22:23-24, Leviticus 20:18)

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

This (and policies of not naming a child until it's lived a certain length of time) are direct consequences of high rates of prenatal and neonatal mortality. That is, life begins at the first breath because otherwise you have to consider an outright crushing number of dead babies. And when you are arguing divine justice is a thing, that gets real hard real fast.

[-] LostWon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. I'm sure high infant mortality rates had a huge influence on the parts of Hammurabi's Code that got adapted into laws in the Bible. Until it could survive on its own, a fetus was basically the property of the would-be father (though so was the would-be mother, yuck), so they were obviously quite desensitized.

this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1353 points (98.4% liked)

News

23367 readers
3061 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS