30
submitted 1 year ago by sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to c/fdroid@lemmy.ml

There's a bunch of closed source ones, the best of which were brought by Adobe, but there's never really been a big open source effort.

GIMP say that the lack of separation between functionality and UI is why they're not behind an effort. That said they said they'd be happy to stick their name on an effort.

But this takes me back to my original question, why are there no open source photo editors, despite their popularity?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Amateur editing on a phone probably out weighs desktop by orders of magnitudes. Most people don't use desktops outside of work and education.

[-] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortuantely, how I see it, FOSS devs are more likely to cater pro/enthusiast users who are more open to try and support desktop solutions. Meanwhile, indie Android devs are also likely to monetize their work. I can't blame them, though.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
30 points (89.5% liked)

F-Droid

8080 readers
18 users here now

F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.

Website | GitLab | Mastodon

Matrix space | forum | IRC

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS