30
submitted 1 year ago by sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to c/fdroid@lemmy.ml

There's a bunch of closed source ones, the best of which were brought by Adobe, but there's never really been a big open source effort.

GIMP say that the lack of separation between functionality and UI is why they're not behind an effort. That said they said they'd be happy to stick their name on an effort.

But this takes me back to my original question, why are there no open source photo editors, despite their popularity?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

i dont think gimp should stick their name on their own product.

[-] ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub 11 points 1 year ago

On the flip side, I grew up most of my life only knowing gimp could stand for gnu image manipulation program, and is still the first place my mind goes to when I hear the word

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I remember watching Pulp Fiction for the first time and being confused as to why the gimp was called that.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
30 points (89.5% liked)

F-Droid

8080 readers
18 users here now

F-Droid is an installable catalogue of FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) applications for the Android platform. The client makes it easy to browse, install, and keep track of updates on your device.

Website | GitLab | Mastodon

Matrix space | forum | IRC

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS