565
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kookaloo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Could you explain which part of eating meat is wrong? We have evolved to what we are today, thanks largely to our ancestors' diets.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One pretty consistent moral among societies is that needlessly causing harm is considered wrong. Outside of lab grown, its impossible to acquire meat without grievously harming an animal. Further, the vast majority of our meat is NOT gained by hunting but instead by factory, and the conditions of meat factories are appalling and horrific. So yes, if we CAN get the nutrients we need without the consumption of meat, that is the most moral way to get our nutrition met. All that being said, even today, being able to meet all nutritional needs without any form of animal cruelty is an incredibly privileged position to be in, and we arent quite at the stage where its fair to judge others for not doing so

(edit: and I say this as a meat eater, meat is fuckin delicious and I dont want to give it up. I'm personally banking on lab grown meat becoming an economical option, at which point we have removed the ethical muddiness of it)

(Edit 2: Lmao, I ruffled the feathers of a lot of meat eaters who've likely never actually had to kill any if the animals they've eaten. I have, I still eat meat. Reality is messy, fucking own it)

[-] GladiusB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Well hunting is a pain in the ass as it is. In an industrialized society we traded markets with shared goods to more specific specialties. Sure I can hunt for food because of licenses and availability but the trade off is most of the people have really good health care. At least objectively they have access to healthcare that can cure things that back in the 1500s would kill you within days.

My point is that at some point someone said "Hey I can take care of the meat portion if you take care of (insert many specialists careers)." There was no morality involved. Choosing to be vegan is fine. I think that it's easier to get certain things from animal sources. So does nature.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

One pretty consistent moral among societies is that needlessly causing harm is considered wrong.

The problem with this as your moral compass is that "needless" can mean whatever you want it to mean. It's not actually a guideline to any specific behavior

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Thats a semantics arguement to a generalized statement which is special kind of stupid. I gave a detailed response to further explain why this applies to meat eating and even ended with saying we havent reached a point in society where its fair to judge others for not abandoning eating meat. Just because society has always done things a certain way, doesnt make it right or moral, slavery was the NORM until around the last couple 100 years, and now its near universally considered atrocious. Meat eating from once living animals will likely be the next once norm, now evil, societal concept. But we arent there yet

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Isn't all morality subjective, rendering your comment moot?

Generally accepted morals certainly can be guidelines for behaviors.

load more comments (36 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 16 points 1 year ago

And some civilisations practised human sacrifice. "We did it in the past" isn't really an arguement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Our ancestors hunted wild animals

Industrialized meat production is horrible and wrong

That's the part that is wrong

Let a pig have a happy life, then kill it. There is no need to force feed it in a coffin size pen for its whole life.

[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's only wrong if you believe hurting other living things is wrong, it depends on your upbringing / mental framework and how you relate those between different species.

But I believe most people agree that the current way we mass produce meat and how we treat these animals is like a dystopian endgame. If humans were treated like that by a higher intelligence that would be extremely disturbing and cruel. We just accept it as we place the priority on a steak on our plate.

It is how it is, everyone is ignorant or a hypocrite in some parts of life. Good or bad are only subjective perspectives. But if you look at the harm we cause to other beings with eating meat and in what mechanistic way, that might be one of the things in 100 years we look back at and just can't fathom.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That's an incredible weak argument. Our ancestors did all kinds of stuff which lead to societies prosperity. Doesn't make all of it morally right.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
565 points (89.8% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5742 readers
888 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS