48
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

In my opinion this is actually better than the CoC. The only thing "missing" is the definition of which qualities you shouldn't discriminate against. But that's now generalized into "groups of people".

I still can't discriminate against people based on any qualification. Hell, I technically can't discriminate against "pineapple on pizza eaters".

[-] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 46 points 1 year ago

Good. Because it's fucking delicious and I don't care what the internet says. We all loved it in the 90s, and nothing has changed. It's still delicious, we just do less coke now.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Obligatory pizza related chime in. You fuck with jalapenos on that sexy pineapple pizza?

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Pineapple pairs the best with spicy pizzas, I always add it as an extra.

[-] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I fucks with jalapenos, yeah. Especially if I'm high. Lol.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Jalapenos with the pineapple is so stupidly good. You get bacon on there and then it's like the crossroads of heavenly flavors. It's not a pizza for the meek.

It's a five gallon hat wearing, tambourine hand flailin, tastebuds up the wall wailin, genuine taste sensation!

[-] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Hot take: ham doesn't go on pizza. The pineapple isn't the problem

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That a spicy one for sure. What's the combo then? I need to know what else to pair with that sweet ol pineapple.

[-] ThisIsNotHim@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Bacon or pepperoni. You need something salty do to do the job that ham fails to do.

Jalapenos are semi-optional. If they're too spicy for someone, then pepperoni might be the choice. There needs to be something spicy to complement the pineapple.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

It's so fucking good, but I'm more of a ham than bacon person. Bacon is too hard for my poor, American, no dental insurance havin' teeth. Lol.

[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Hmm, does that mean you're also going soft not crispy pizza?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You heretic! I want you to know that if I could discriminate against you for putting pineapple on pizza, I absolutely would!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 1 year ago

What about people who don't eat pizza crust?

[-] Shazbot@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They are wonderful people. Especially when they tear off the crust so I can eat it.

[-] DharmaCurious@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

They're useful idiots if they give me their crusts.

[-] Xylinna@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Some day we will eradicate your kind

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

As it is worded you can't discriminate against nazis and racists either.

[-] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

You can discriminate all you want, you just can't harass, bully, violate privacy or threaten violence.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I think you can't read it too literally. Otherwise you also can't discriminate against "people who wrote their comment later" and so you can never stop reading the comments for fear of discriminating between "early comment writers" and "late comment writers".

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Literal is the only way these things are supposed to be read.

They could easily fix it by saying "groups (except for those that promote discrimination and/or hate such as nazis and racists)"

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

By my reading of it, you can still discriminate against pineapple pizza eaters, or any other group whatsoever, you just can't harass, bully, violate their privacy or threaten them with violence. Which is fine by me, if someone wants to make a community only for ginger haired people and ban anyone they think isn't naturally ginger, that's their perogative.

[-] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

That was my takeaway, too, and I think it's positive. The nice thing is, if it turns out that the policy fosters behavior that's bad for the broader community, they can change it.

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I like my pineapple pizzas with a bbq base 🤪 don't come after me 😂

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I'll split that pizza with you.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Nazis are a group of people. Republicans are a group of people. Pedophiles are a group of people.

[-] MrMusAddict@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's a bad faith argument. The ToS also says to not engage in illegal activity. The admonishment of Nazi's and Pedophiles is an admonishment of illegal evil.

Your inclusion of Republicans is a bit of an extreme juxtaposition. Feel free to admonish the individual evil views of Republicans, but to discriminate against Republicans purely for their association is rightly against ToS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lemann@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

We could do this for any group of people we don't like IMO... Doesn't make it right, regardless of how disgusting their actions may be ☹️

[-] Leperhero@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Kebab meat and pineapple, thin crust. I will fight to the death for that

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
48 points (60.0% liked)

Fediverse

17717 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS