18

Hi there,

I wish to run a wireguard docker through a glueton docker so that i can access my paid vpn from my own server. This is what i want:

client -> wireguard docker(selfhosted) -> gluetun docker(connected to paid VPN) -> internet

I have posted before with this issue but still cannot get it to work as expected. I am not sure if there is issues with the wireguard docker not being able to route back through from gluetun as it is trying to force traffic through the tunnel.

Any help would be much appreciated.

docker-compose.yml:

services:
  gluetun_test:
    image: qmcgaw/gluetun
    container_name: gluetun_test
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    ports:
      - "5010:5000"
      - "5011:8000"
     # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
      - "36843:36843/udp"
    environment:
      - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
      - VPN_TYPE=wireguard
      - WIREGUARD_PUBLIC_KEY=
      - WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_IP=ip
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_PORT=port
      - WIREGUARD_ADDRESSES="10.2.0.2/32"

  wireguard:
    image: linuxserver/wireguard:latest
    container_name: wireguard
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    environment:
      - PUID=1000
      - PGID=1000
    volumes:
      - ./wireguard/config:/config
#    ports:
      # Port for WireGuard-UI
#      - "5010:5000"
      # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
#      - "36843:36843/udp"
    network_mode: service:gluetun_test
    sysctls:
      - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1

wg0.conf

# Address updated at:     2023-07-08 18:51:31.120262753 +0000 UTC
# Private Key updated at: 2023-05-09 18:59:02.233090133 +0000 UTC
[Interface]
Address = 10.252.1.0/24
ListenPort = 36843
PrivateKey = 
MTU = 1450
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Table =

[Peer]
PublicKey = 
PresharedKey = 
AllowedIPs = 10.252.1.1/24
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I second this. It is probably the simplest way to get it working.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
18 points (87.5% liked)

Selfhosted

40246 readers
543 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS