259
submitted 10 months ago by Silverseren@kbin.social to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

CNN’s Wolf Blitzer seemed at a lost of words at the justification being used to bomb a refugee camp in Gaza.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work -1 points 10 months ago

He could have questioned the certainty that a specific Hamas guy was even present in (or under, I guess) the camp in order to make the admission of guilt more specific. For example: https://twitter.com/martyrmade/status/1719572283436782057?t=UM-uSl5z89Ua4uaw0p2-xw&s=19

Other follow up questions might include "who specifically ordered the airstrike?" and "if you wanted to minimize civilian casualties, why conduct an airstrike on a refugee camp at all?".

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

And those follow up questions may well have been asked, if they hadn't lost sound on the call. But regardless of how you think you might have handled it, there was nothing wrong with the angle Wolf took here. He kept the focus squarely on the horrific nature of the decision and refused to let the guy weasel out of it.

[-] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work -4 points 10 months ago

I'm not so credulous to believe that they really lost sound, but okay.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Cool. Enjoy your tinfoil hat bud.

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
259 points (91.6% liked)

World News

32082 readers
892 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS