17
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
17 points (70.7% liked)
Tankiejerk
622 readers
3 users here now
Dunking on Tankies from a leftist perspective.
A tankie is someone who defends/supports authoritarian or even totalitarian regimes who call themselves "socialist". The term originated from people supporting the 1956 invasion of Hungary by the Soviet Union. Nowadays they are just terminally online, denying genocides, and falling for totalitarian propaganda and calling such regimes "true democracies". remember to censor usernames when necessary.
Please be sure to obscure usernames on posts to prevent doxxing.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I think it's more that tankies in general seem to have an oddly-specific hatred of anime fans. "CSAM" is just a convenient excuse here.
Makes no sense with the number of tankies using anime avatars on social media.
Redfash makes zero sense either and yet here we are
I’m confused by the downvotes, do we like redfash here?
Fascism is an incoherent ideology, including red fascism.
I mean, I would prefer to take them at their word before assuming a secret hidden motive.
They stated they think cartoon shows with children are inherently sexual. If they believe that, Ill believe them. They think kids are porn.
That one is a very complicated issue.
On one hand, the anime community, especially those within the lolicon community, have a pedo problem. It's less serious in Japan (I've seen some artists being really mad at those who use the "pedo" tag on Pixiv), but the west just glorifies it as "gatekeeping", which they think will keep the fandom pure of outside influences, while they're being infiltrated by the right. This leads to them using right wing "arguments", like argument from hypocrisy, the whole "people who see X are the real X", or the whole "the LGBTQ+ are the real predators".
On the other hand, one could argue that not even all "loli" type characters are canonically kids, some real women find comfort in them (a lot of men really need certain "adult signifiers", and seen a lot of women being harassed for not looking or talking mature enough), and the evidence trying to tie the "just drawings" to real harm is really foggy and often seem to be the same exact ones used by anti-porn activists to try to bullshit their will onto other people through the law (see the ban on "extreme pornography" in the UK, where people argued it would normalize "dangerous sexual acts"). Hell, I remember people fearing pubic hair removal will lead to the normalization of pedophilia since I remember pubic hair removal being a thing.