433
Nice (lemmy.fmhy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago by upsiderue@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 9 points 1 year ago

You're right, nobody defined the base of the numbers either. Come to think of it, what makes you think that those are numbers at all? That's nothing but a random arrangement of pixels. I mean, who am I to tell you how to interpret the photons reaching your retina? You're nothing but excitations in the electric fields in my neurons, anyways.

[-] Llewellyn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I adore structure of your comment!

[-] nandeEbisu@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Its not that there's no definition for the notation, but if you fall back to commonly held definitions, there is divergence in common definitions without the parenthesis. Plenty of calculators, especially old ones, don't respect PEMDAS, so the so by adding brackets your expression is going to fit the intended operations in more commonly used systems than had you left the brackets out.

I also do think its a bit more readable as your eyes are initially drawn to the first operation, you can start evaluating expressions without even parsing the rest of the equation, or you can just block out that entire chunk when you start looking at how many terms are in the equation. That's subjective though, so to each their own.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
433 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

45189 readers
1334 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS