632
Mike Johnson Admits He and His Son Monitor Each Other's Porn Intake in Resurfaced Video
(www.rollingstone.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
632 points (94.8% liked)
News
23608 readers
3702 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
So he's sharing what kind of porn he looks at with a minor.
I'm sure the republicans will be very upset about that. Right?...
I wonder who Jack's accountability partner is on his other phone. Hmmm
I am Jack's accountability partner also his cold sweat and his total lack of surprise
I think the point here is to not look at porn becaue his son is then going to find out about it. "He’s sharing what kind of porn he looks at with a minor" is about as stupid take on this as that article is to begin with.
Arguing for involving your own son in the management of your porn habits, is that really the hill you want to die on?
No but I really wish it was the hill this chuckle fuck would die on.
Won't they think of the children?
Oh they do.
Far too much and not in a healthy way.
They did think of the children when they asked themselves "who should keep me accountable for the porn I watch".
I'm not sure how they got to that conclusion and I don't want to know.
What makes you think Johnson isn't "thinking" about the children when he uses a child to watch him watch porn?
"Let's make a strawman of this dude calling out a strawman"
Reading books to kids in a costume is way too sexual, but automatically sending porn to your underage kid is not, got it.
That's the jizz of it.
I'm sorry, but are we reading the same article? There's no mention of anybody sending porn to anyone let alone about reading books to kids in a costume. You alright man?
My bad, my comment required not just reading this article, but having a basic understanding of current events, and that was clearly way too much to expect from you.
"It sends a report to your accountability partner. My accountability partner right now is Jack, my son. He’s 17. So he and I get a report about all the things that are on our phones, all of our devices, once a week. If anything objectionable comes up, your accountability partner gets an immediate notice."
So if he looks at anything "objectionable" (meaning porn), it sends it so his underage son.
That part was about the conservative outrage about people in drag reading to kids. I was pointing out how drag is apparently too sexual for kids, but their fathers porn watching habits is not not.
I'm sorry my knowledge of internal politics of a country I don't live in did not match your expectations. Controversy about people reading books to kids in drag indeed sounds really important though and definitely something I should have been aware of. This is totally a failure on my part.
Previously you said:
Is he sending his son links to porn or is he not? You're not being very cohesive here.
No problem. I just assumed that since you're engaging in a debate about it, you know at least the basics about the current political situation.
By looking at porn, the programs he installed on his and his sons devices shares it. It's cohesive, you just need to thing about for more than 1 second.
Clearly it says a report is sent, not the actual content. I'm all with you but let's not invent stuff
yes