42
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by gerikson@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

Title is ... editorialized.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fasterandworse@awful.systems 5 points 1 year ago

would UV-C lighting be considerably more expensive? Would there have been obvious high-costs to tip them off that these were no regular black lights?

[-] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Not really. Fluorescent UVC lights are very similar to black lights, they just don't have the fluorescent coating inside the glass. LED lighting also shouldn't have been significantly more expensive.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Nah, they're like $20.

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1401 readers
142 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS