this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2023
125 points (96.3% liked)

UKCasual

6611 readers
1 users here now

A friendly place to chat.

No politics please. Don't be a dick.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

He ought to have sparked a constitutional crisis and refused to say it. Then he should have devolved the government.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which would signal the end of the monarchy.

No bad thing, really.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Got to spend it on something.

[–] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He'd basically be dissolving his own position at that point right?

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Presumably it'd mean either the end of the monarchy or the end of the government as we know it, so it's a win-win for us lol

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Yes. But why remain as an impotent king?

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

I mean he's 70-odd and has basically been powerless his whole life, if the options are to rock the boat or kick the can down the road and live out his last decade or two doing bugger-all in unimaginable opulence, I can see why he'd pick the latter.

Like it's not necessarily the morally right option, but I get it.

[–] 3arn0wl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] ReCursing@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Preferably in hydrofloric acid

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

If it devolved any more it would be primordial soup.