130
based history rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/7802418

Don't forget about the Irish unification of 2024!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes

behavior involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

Do you propose, then, that everyone should be allowed to do as they please with absolutely zero rules?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Point to where I added my opinion.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Forgive me for assuming you considered violence to be bad.

Since we've presupposed that all authority must in some way stem from the threat of violence, a hatred for violence cannot exist without a hatred for authority.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I ask again, point to where I added my opinion on the matter.

What exactly is your point.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

I just did, and I stated it two replies ago.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You have not quoted me once, you've projected your feelings into my statements and yet cannot explain which one you're deriving your flawed opinion of me from.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.

You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child's dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I'm a bit confused as to your point.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That was my point.

Point to where I ever said or implied such a thing, please you don't actually have a point without a quote you can reference.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you aren't presenting an opinion and your intent with this discussion was just to stir the pot for no reason.

Good to know I'm talking to a troll. Have a nice life.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I provided a statement of fact, if that's stirring the pot to you then consider it stirred.

Not at all, I've responded in good faith, why you're upset is beyond me.

this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
130 points (99.2% liked)

196

16505 readers
2255 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS