Linux

56494 readers

1269 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Comparison between NixOS vs blendOS vs Vanilla OS: what to pick and why? (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/linux@lemmy.ml

74 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So I've recently taken an interest in these three distros:

All of these offer something very interesting:
Access to (basically) all Linux-capable software, no matter from what repo.

Both NixOS and blendOS are based on config files, from which your system is basically derived from, and Vanilla OS uses a package manager apx to install from any given repo, regardless of distribution.

While I've looked into Fedora Silverblue, that distro is limited to only install Flatpaks (edit: no, not really), which is fine for "apps", but seems to be more of a problem with managing system- and CLI tools.

I haven't distro hopped yet, as I'm still on Manjaro GNOME on my devices.

What are your thoughts on the three distros mentioned above?
Which ones are the most interesting, and for what reasons?

Personally, I'm mostly interested in NixOS & blendOS, as I believe they may have more advantages compared to Arch;

What do you think?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Audacity9961@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Is there something that attracts you to NixOS for that purpose?

I've got Nix OS running on one of my computers, and honestly, haven't found it to be particularly notable for those usecases.

[–] rikudou 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I, on the other hand, use it as a daily driver and find it very suitable for both.

[–] Audacity9961@feddit.ch 1 points 2 years ago

It is suitable sure, I don't dislike NixOS at all, which I why I continue to run it on one of my pcs. I like the concept that it employs.

I just do think it offers a less polished experience, that is significantly less intuitive than other workstation distros, for little to no gain, if you don't need one of its specific usecases.

[–] tanja@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’ve got Nix OS running on one of my computer

That's very interesting 👀
Why did you choose NixOS?

[–] Audacity9961@feddit.ch 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Mostly to learn about it's unique selling points.

I think it is very interesting in terms of the easy deployment of specific environments, and in terms of writing recipes for new packages.

Having said that, outside of these two rather niche areas for home use, I think it is rather unintuitive and offers no real advantages over more established players that offer a more polished experience, like Fedora for workstation and gaming use.