I like the intention, but I'm worried about the advice near the end

Learn to see things that aren't "leftist" as radical.

I.e. a whole bunch of settle for less

I want leftist spaces, groups, what have you without tankies, not community centers who dislike the current government.

Am I missing something? I'm new to this 🥺

There are GPU-locked apps?

Wtf

Your explanation works very well, but completely falls apart in the last paragraph.

Solar power production clearly is (at least in part) a post-scarsity scenario, given we literally have too much power on the grid.

Furthermore, calling the power market anything like "free" is just plain wrong. A liberal approach to market regulation here would have led to disaster a long time ago, for the reasons you described at the beginning of your comment.

The market "works" because of, not inspite of regulation.

And negative prices are a good thing for consumers, not market failure.

Nice

Good to see one of the two big packaging hubs do something against malware

NixOS mentioned 👀👀👀❄️

Ain't no one getting excited about any kind of capitalism any more 🤮🤢

Trans Jesus is canon ✨🏳️‍⚧️

It simply makes no sense that it only blocks Chinese citizens specifically.

I don't want anyone to buy/own housing which goes uninhabited for a long time while there are so many homeless people who need a place to call home.

It's difficult to imagine a person struggling to buy/rent an apartment/house, and for them to get mad about nationalities, rather than the fact that housing needs to be an "investment opportunity" over being recognized as the basic human need that it really is.

I hardly care if it's Chinese people, Wallstreet, some Big Tech corporation, or just individual landlords driving up prices.

Housing must be accessible to all people, if a society wants to call itself civilized.

This bill going against Chinese citizens, rather than all foreigners tells you all you need to know about the real motivations behind it.

Based

Genau so, und nicht anders

Über Menschenrechte und Inklusion ist nicht zu debattieren. 🏳️‍🌈✨

Honestly, as long as you're not going for a clickbait-like thing with lots of 😂, 😭, and 💀, when is not really justified, I don't really see an issue.

Personally I'll use ✨, ☺️, 🌸, and 🥺 regularly in my comments as I think they're cute 🥺✨

Rather disappointing.

I'd be in favor of a law requiring the labeling of such products, but this seems to overreach; especially when applied to animal feed.

100% based; Was already worried where this community was headed

BLÅHAJ Lemmy W