76
submitted 11 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 57 points 11 months ago

This has been known and warned for probably decades now.

But still we continue to "preemptively" use it in vast quantities in the meat, milk and egg industry instead of using sustainable or even humane conditions for the animals in question.

Guess who gets to eat antibiotics evey day, increasing likelihood of multi resistant germs?

Meat eaters. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8565197/

Nothing will be done about it until its too late. As is tradition. Profits are more important than world wide disaster. Again.

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 20 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Multiple countries need to fix their inadequate regulations to stop aggravating antibiotics resistance, including:

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

I was also shocked to learn the US have over the counter antiobiotics that people pop for random illness and minor cuts/scrapes. Pretty much unthinkable here (EUN)

[-] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 months ago

We absolutely do not have over-the-counter antibiotics, they need a prescription every time

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Besides the topicals OTC that i outlined in here, US friends of mine "keep" their remaining prescription ABs for when they are sick again.

Like he got prescribed some for a COLD and then kept them to pop when he gets the next COLD :'D

Its nuts. Some OTC, others simply overprescribed.

Here you get a prescription if you have a severe infection, OR a substantial injury with high risk.

[-] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Wait, I'm assuming you're from somewhere in Europe, you don't have topical antibiotics available without prescription?!

I wouldn't argue against antibiotics being overprescribed in America, they definitely are. The tendency is for medicine to be prescribed if a patient sees a doctor. Another crappy consequence of an expensive medical system, people won't be satisfied if they spent hundreds of dollars only to be told to rest and drink lots of fluids.

US friends of mine "keep" their remaining prescription ABs for when they are sick again

This is definitely a thing that morons do over here ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] millie@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago

We definitely don't have that at all.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yes, some topical AB are available according to a quick online search

Some topical antibiotics can be purchased as over-the-counter (OTC) medicines.
However, it is always recommended that you consult a medical expert before purchasing and using any medication.
Topical antibiotics are used to treat skin wounds, scrapes, scratches, and minor burns.
They are available in ointment, cream, spray, or powder forms and are used to prevent infection in topical skin ailments.
Some over-the-counter topical antibiotics include: Bacitracin (Neosporin)
Polymyxin (Polysporin)
Neomycin (Neosporin Plus Pain Relief)
Pramoxine
Benzoyl peroxide (Proactiv)

[-] millie@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

There's a huge difference between saying 'antibiotics are available OTC' and 'topical antibiotics are available OTC'. One is misleading clickbait nonsense, the other is true.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Thats why i didnt write what you claim i did.

"they have over the counter antiobiotics"

As in antibiotics exist there that are OTC.

Is that so absurd?

[-] Swallowtail@beehaw.org 11 points 11 months ago

Go vegan. It's better for the planet too.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

I know, i am vegan for those reasons and more :)

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 months ago

being vegan doesn't help the planet at all.

[-] amzd@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

How does reducing land and water use through your food choice not help the planet?

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

it doesn't actually reduce the use.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

Please don't tell me you're gonna bring up the stupid soy fields in the rain forest argument :'D

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

being vegan doesn't stop soy from being grown in rainforests

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

environmental destruction continues whether you are vegan or not.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

also what part of my comment prompted you to post that random response?

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

yep due to the meat industry keeping going regardless of a fairly small demographic quitting their products

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

so maybe you should stop lying to people about being vegan helping the planet.

[-] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

It does, if enough people did it.

You're so angry lol

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago

what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

It does, if enough people did it.

do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

It takes less land and water to feed someone wheat, soy or corn than to feed them beef, chicken or pork.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

what crops that are fed to beef chicken and pork are parts of plants that people won't eat for the most part. The same fields that grow the soybeans we use for oil are growing soybeans that are used as feed. The same soybeans that are used for oil are used for feed.

[-] fuzzywolf23@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

This is sometimes true. However, e.g., about 4% of the farmland in California is used for alfafa, which is just for livestock. Alfafa is also a very water intensive crop.

Additionally, there are other uses that livestock corn feed could be put to if there weren't so many damn cows, so it's not like we'd be throwing away megatons of silage if it weren't for cattle.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 months ago

it's not like we'd be throwing away megatons of silage if it weren't for cattle.

I don't think there is a better use than making food. I'm fine with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22028 readers
66 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS