71

Is it possible to create something where knowing about the thing constitutes copyright infringement?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] foo@withachanceof.com 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I suppose you could argue an "illegal number" is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegal_number.

For example, the HD DVD encryption key saga was originally fought via DMCA notices to Digg: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AACS_encryption_key_controversy

[-] demystify@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 months ago

Heads up, your first link is borked

[-] foo@withachanceof.com 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Works for me with Lemmy-UI. I'm guessing whatever client/browser you're using is including the period at the end of the sentence in the URL.

[-] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

But you have to know the number. It's not copyright infringement if you just know there is a number.

[-] dillekant@slrpnk.net -2 points 10 months ago

So I suppose being able to memorise and then replicate it? That's not bad. I was thinking along the lines of knowing about a joke where Taylor Swift lyrics were attributed to Mark Twain (for example) would violate Tay tay's moral right of attribution, and that could happen by simply knowing the joke.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
71 points (92.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53939 readers
318 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS