59
apparently this is a LinkedIn screenshot
(feddit.de)
We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.
We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.
Partnerships:
/join #antiwork
)
They want someone who addresses problems instead of ignoring them... seems reasonable.
They should have asked the candidate about the crying baby. Maybe it was not theirs? Maybe he was so stressed he blocked it out?
Instead of being human and humane, the company interviewer acted like a robot, trying to find a catch not to hire the guy. Note: the interviewer also had to ignore the crying baby and not acknowledge it on the call! What if the baby was in danger?
Revolting. Corporate drone brain-worms.