152
submitted 10 months ago by Gork@lemm.ee to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I installed plan 9 successfully about 15 years ago. And then I did not know what to do.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There was at one time a group pushing to make a more active up to date. User friendly plan 9. Distro if I remember correctly called Harvey OS. They may still be at it. But such a small group means that it's going to take a long time combined with a lot of effort. And at this point so many things have moved on and become rather linux specific even. That the task only keeps getting more and more difficult.

Honestly, in the interim, many of plan 9's better features were adopted in some small part or completely by other operating systems. Definitely not quite as elegantly.

What I really want to know is why is nobody here talking about inferno. It's what came after plan 9.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

Sounds like my experience with QNX 6. It was fun for a while, especially with the microkernel novelty. I could kill the mouse driver and bring it back to life. It was interesting to have that on a 486 with memory corruption issues.

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
152 points (93.7% liked)

linuxmemes

20705 readers
2900 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS