29
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

True. FPTP is utter trash, but look what UKIP did under that system to push their agenda. They only won one, maybe two, seats. Corbyn could force Starmer's hand in the same way Farrage did. Why is that not a possibility?

If we need radical left thinking back in our politics why have they effectively given up?

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe it doesn't have quite the support that the vocal group believes it does?

Those at the top know this and would rather play in the Labour playground where they get noticed rather than languish in obscurity if they split off.

UKIP had support on both sides of the fence, not just Tories, and had a strong narrative that they've been working on. Corbyn Labour does not.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe it doesn't have quite the support that the vocal group believes it does?

I believe they have..... momentum on their side 😎.

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Ba dum cha!

Maybe they do, I don't know, perhaps it's not that they fear that they would languish but find it easier to do what they do because they can concentrate on their core message?

Either way, as a remainer, I don't believe that it's the same as UKIP as they were taking votes from both Labour and Conservatives, but for different reasons. The Tories managed to grab Labour voters by pandering to that crowd.

Corbyn Labour hasn't position itself as being a cross party concern so there is no benefit on being outside the party.

this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
29 points (96.8% liked)

UK Politics

3090 readers
72 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS