340
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Care to provide a source to all those nuke threats or should I roam the informational warzone on my own? And also explain how that would be one-sided Russian aggression rather than escalation between two great power as has been tradition for 70 years now? Even if what you say is true, mere threats of warfare don't equate to training terrorists and backing Al-Qaeda, which the Taliban is known to have done. Those were literally United Stadia's enemies, one of which even did a successful attack on USA soil that killed 3 thousand, as you'll never forget. If not financing a foreign country's war with Russia is treason, then everybody (in and out of government) who advocated for pulling out of Afghanistan should be tried first. Obviously I don't believe that either of those actually are treason, just pointing out how nonsensical this notion is.

"Cyber attacks" and "information warfare" are just hyperbolic terms for things every non-allied powerful country engages in. Even allies like the USA and EU spy on each other.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you are just admitting to being uninformed. Excellent.

[-] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

So you admitted your sources are made of thin air. Excellent. Back your claims buddy, I never claimed to know every single thing every European does to themselves. What is your opinion on the FRG9, Sir Knowsalot?

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

There are tons of videos of Russian media unironically calling to nuke Europe. They even released CGI videos of New York being nuked. I can't follow the news for you buddy.

[-] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago

links or sources? "There are tons of videos of" Obama playing Fortnite with Trump. This is a forum about news discussions so if you're expecting anybody to come here and not ask for news and sources backing your claims and to trust what you say blindly, you might be a bit lost.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Crazy how you seem to get two instant votes here

[-] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No idea about that either, maybe I have a fan. I don't see how a single meaningless upvote is that important though. But it's also crazy how you insist on replying within minutes without backing your claims. Have you anything to say that is not just hearsay?

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't read for you, sealion. Try Google, if it isn't blocked in your country.

[-] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Oh, so you get to claim whatever on a news forum, but then when pressed I'm the one who actually has to find out what exactly you're even talking about? And in case I can't read your mind, I'm the sealion? How would I even know what events exactly you're even trying to mysteriously hint at? Come now, if you don't wish to show me wrong or inform literally anybody beyond vague hearsay what exactly even is the point of you posting here? This ain't Reddit mate.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] AlbigensianGhoul@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know what sealioning is. However the effort you took to fetch that bookmarked Wikipedia page you could've used to provide me some source for your nuclear threat claims for us to discuss and analyse properly as is typical of a news forum. Given that I'm actually putting a bit of time and effort to reply to you and that the point of this forum is to inform, assuming everybody who comes here has access to every information about whatever remote country you may live on and what specific threats you are referring to is just a waste of bandwidth and account and you might as well just remove yourself from here.

For instance, those threats could've come right after similar threats from your random country in which case it would be escalation (and you'd link me to the wikipedia article of Whataboutism rather than whatever source you find actually interesting, as you people like to do). I have no way of knowing what "constant" threats you are talking about because tensions between some American countries and Russia have been ongoing for more than 10 years now. So far you have made a very strong unsourced claim and then proceeded to waste this comment section by assuming random shit about me. If you don't have anything of substance to say, go back to Reddit to updoot your narwhals in silence.

Edit: fucking finally you provided it, too bad it was on an unmarked edit. Either way I'm not sure I'd consider something from the height of the war a whole year ago "constant", and the threat is being made by a TV show. In their own words "Moscow says it went into Ukraine as a pre-emptive strike against NATO, as Ukraine was seeking nuclear weapons.", so it would still fall into an escalation rather than a blanket threat. Typical thing done by opposing Nuclear Powers since nuclear bombs were invented.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
340 points (95.7% liked)

World News

32082 readers
840 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS