57
submitted 1 year ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dumdum666@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

That’s far from the only interpretation.

What is the explanation then?

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Free in both Gaza and the West Bank is the main one. "From the river to the sea excluding a 40 km gap roughly in the middle" just doesn't have the same ring. There's also the one-state interpretation, where the Jews are still there but living alongside Palestinians as equals (nice but currently implausible IMO).

Taken without any context, it actually says nothing about Israel at all, or the exact nature of said Palestinian freedom somewhere between those two landmarks. With context it means more, but the context varies considerably depending on whether it's, say, a peace-loving Jew or Hamas saying it.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

I understand that there actually might be some people that mean it in the ways you are explaining.

Since Hamas has adopted it more than 10 years ago, it is at least (!) a dogwhistle by now. The whole phrase is burned for a peaceful message because of this.

It’s been a saying in Palestine since Israel happened to them.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

You mean the UN partition plan from 1948 that Israel accepted to create Israel?

What’s your point?

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today -1 points 1 year ago

I wish there was a way to actually measure what people mean. As far as I can tell, there's a lot of people just like me who think the Palestinians have gotten an unfair shake, but have nothing against Jews, or in some cases actually are Jews. The actual antisemites are also quietly in the same spaces. I really don't think hate is the main motivator overall, but I can't prove it either.

Sadly, that particular chant is probably going to have even more staying power now that it's under attack.

It means free Palestine.

If it’s a cry for genocide what is it that’s in the Israeli constitution about that same area being an inextricable part of a Jewish state?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 year ago

Isn’t Israel in the way?

Palestine isn’t a country

It’s be like the Cree claiming all of Canada vs Canada claiming all of Canada

Please argue in good faith, you don’t help us when you take such bad stances

The key word there would be Jewish. If it’s genocidal to say from the river to the sea Israel will be Arab (which isn’t even what people say in English!) how is it not genocidal to say from the river to the sea Israel will be Jewish? How is that bad faith?

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh no, we want a secular Israel

The bad faith is getting rid of Israel, getting rid of Israel/converting them to Islam is how this whole thing started ~1000 years ago or whatever

The pro Palestine argument is coexist

You can look at the US civil rights movement, King’s (and others) anti-violence approach (while the other side was extremely violent) is why it was so successful. The aggressor can’t paint the other side as bad if they don’t commit crimes

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
57 points (93.8% liked)

Canada

7203 readers
179 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS