83
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
83 points (97.7% liked)
Cars - For Car Enthusiasts
3935 readers
1 users here now
About Community
c/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on Lemmy and the fediverse. We're your central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news, reviews, projects, DIY guides, advice, stories, and more.
Rules
- Stay respectful to the community, hold civil discussions, even when others hold opinions that may differ from yours.
- This is not an NSFW community, and any such content will not be tolerated.
- Policy, not politics! Policy discussions revolve around the concept; political discussions revolve around the individual, party, association, etc. We only allow POLICY discussions and political discussions should go to c/politics.
- Must be related to cars, anything that does not have connection to cars will be considered spam/irrelevant and is subject to removal.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's significantly better for car dynamics. It does add complexity, but not really "expensively wrong", since Honda's system is almost entirely mechanical sans some slightly long power steering lines. There's very little to go wrong.
See now you put it that way and all of a sudden I'm wondering why this never caught on. O.O
It's honestly because 99% of drivers never push their car hard enough to see the actual handling benefits of 4WS while moving, and most parking lots are already designed around traditional cars' turning radius making the low-speed maneuverability not terribly beneficial. The system is simple ans super cool but it IS still added cost, and ultimately the market made it not worth the additional manufacturing complexity.