Tools to compare ping times between ISPs to common services (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by derprondo@alien.top to c/homelab@selfhosted.forum

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'll consider myself one lucky SOB with major first world problems in that I currently have in my home two fiber providers and must choose to keep only one. One is AT&T, the other a much smaller municipal broadband style company.

I want to compare latency between the two services. I noticed that when I swapped the connections, that the municipal fiber had considerably higher latency to the services I was already monitoring (ie 9ms vs 30ms to 1.1.1.1, 8.8.8.8, and google.com. Screenshot

I was wondering if there's a simple tool anyone knows about to compare ping times to a wide range of common services? Currently I just have InfluxDB and a Telegraph script pinging the sites previously mentioned, with Grafana displaying the metrics. I could just manually add other services to this setup, but was wondering if anyone knows about a purpose built tool for this with a big list of services built in? It would be awesome if I could just spin up a container that did all of this, and if something doesn't exist like this already maybe I'll just create it and base it on the same Influx+Telegraph+Grafana solution I'm using now.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] keivmoc@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

EDIT: I really don't want this post to turn into a debate about the merits of doing this, I just want to discuss tools that are out there that could do this.

Too bad. ICMP echo requests to a local anycast server don't tell you anything about the service or a provider's ability to handle those connections.

As a small ISP, I would like to know what your goal is here, or at least what you hope to discover.

[-] derprondo@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

I just wanted to collect a range of endpoints for common services and get some data to compare, especially to see if there's anything egregious. For example, on AT&T fiber I get 11ms to Blizzard's east coast servers, but on my other fiber connection it's 77ms.

It's all moot anyway, I don't think I'm going to stay with the smaller company. I have to pay $5 extra a month just to get a public IP on my router, otherwise I'm NATd somewhere upstream. Then it turned out they couldn't make IPV6 work anymore because switching me to a static IP turned off DHCP and they don't have support for static IPV6 yet. Anyway it's kind of shit show. The icing on the cake is when I got a billing email from them showing that they're running billing software that went extinct 15 years ago (Rodopi if you're familiar, I couldn't believe it, worked with it myself back in 2002).

[-] keivmoc@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

For example, on AT&T fiber I get 11ms to Blizzard's east coast servers, but on my other fiber connection it's 77ms.

Ah, interesting. We switched transit providers a year ago and noticed a big improvement in routing efficiency. Small providers are usually at the mercy of their upstream peers unless they can build their own backbone links to an IX.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023

1 points (100.0% liked)

Homelab

371 readers

2 users here now

Rules

Be Civil.
Post about your homelab, discussion of your homelab, questions you may have, or general discussion about transition your skill from the homelab to the workplace.
No memes or potato images.
We love detailed homelab builds, especially network diagrams!
Report any posts that you feel should be brought to our attention.
Please no shitposting or blogspam.
No Referral Linking.
Keep piracy discussion off of this community

founded 11 months ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

rglullis@communick.news