336
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Salamendacious@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Passengers who booked trips have been told refunds will be issued in monthly installments

...

Life at Sea Cruises' first three-year sailing was announced in March and promised passengers willing to fork out at least $29,999 per year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 123 points 11 months ago

Cruise ships really need to disappear if we are gonna keep this planet somewhat livable. Mega polluters.

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 50 points 11 months ago

The problem isn't the ships it's the insane amount of diesel they suck down. We already run giant ships powered by nuclear reactors.

[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago

Honest question: do the use diesel? A lot of big ships when they are not in a nation's waters burn bunker oil which is significantly worse.

[-] towerful@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

While googling this, it seems like there is an international cap on marine fuels for 0.5% sulphur.
https://www.cruisemapper.com/wiki/752-cruise-ship-engine-propulsion-fuel
A lot of ports and shipping areas require 0.1% sulphur content.

A lot of places I've read say things along the lines of "cruise ships run on diesel, specifically MDO or MGO".
E.g.
https://luxurytraveldiva.com/what-does-a-cruise-ship-use-for-fuel/

Here's a thing about MDO and MGO.
https://maritimepage.com/what-are-mgo-and-mdo-fuels-marine-fuels-explained/
MGO is 0.1% sulphur content.
MDO is 2% sulphur content.
For comparison, car diesel sulphur content is like 0.001%.
Best source I can find for bunker fuel is 3.5%. So, MDO/MGO are better than bunker fuel, I guess. Feels like a rebrand with minor improvements, so everyone can say "yeh, it's just diesel. Not bunker fuel".

But 2% MDO is still a 40% improvement over 3.5% bunker fuel.

Seems like there is a lot of changing and outdated information on this.
And it being related to international trading, laws and standards... There doesn't seem to be a reliable definitive source on it.

My takeaway is "yeh, it's not bunker fuel. It's diesel. But it's not diesel as we know it from driving cars, trucks, tractors and other plant"

[-] chicory@midwest.social 5 points 11 months ago

I was surprised to learn that many cruise ships burn diesel rather than bunker oil.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

That's a recent change, IIRC, and not all cruise lines are in on it.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Cruise ships are pretty big polluters, yes. Cruise passengers have about 8x the emissions that they'd have from a comparable land-based vacation.

But when people talk about ship pollution, they're usually talking about non-carbon pollution.

For example, ships often burn heavy fuel oil, which produces tons of sulfur dioxide, which causes acid rain, and NOX, which depletes the ozone and causes smog and asthma.

Cruise ships are bad for the environment, but there's honestly bigger fish to fry. Gas power plants are way, way worse for the planet.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 11 months ago

It’s all bad. This isn’t a competition. It all needs to cease.

[-] ganove@feddit.de 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Are you comparing power plants to cruise ships?

[-] frezik@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

From the comparisons I've made in the past, they're also relatively cheap compared to land based vacations. For some reason, it's cheaper to make your hotel float.

Then there's places where ships are more inherent to the experience, like transiting the Panama canal, or coastal regions of Alaska or Norway. Places that are too remote to get to by most other means.

But fuck Caribbean cruises. That's a boat taking you from one tourist outdoor shopping mall to another.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Nations won't stop using oil as long as it is economically viable.

[-] Locuralacura@lemm.ee -2 points 11 months ago

We're already forced to burn oil to power air conditioners so our elders don't die in heatwave. Just imagine the inside of a giant Vegas casino without electricity.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Way to complete ignore my point.

[-] Locuralacura@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

You said we will still use oil because it's profitable. I said that we can't stop using oil, because our earth is too hot, because we are too much burning oil. How am I off topic?

My point is, it's not economically viable for an elderly Texan to spend 500 bucks on inflated energy prices during a heatwave, but it's not like there is a choice. We're gonna burn it all up because we don't know how to stop.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
336 points (95.9% liked)

News

23284 readers
3564 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS