123
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

Anatoly Karlin @powerfultakes

Replying to @RichardHanania

I'm against legalizing bestiality because the animal consent problem hasn't been solved, but probably actually will be quite soon thanks to Al (at least for the higher animals with complex languages). So why not wait a few more years. I don't see disgust as a good reason. It was an evolutionary adaptation of the agricultural era against the spread of zoonotic illnesses, but technology will soon make that entirely irrelevant as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

lgbt rights bad because Chesterton fence something something.

also

Consent standards:

(╯°o°)╯︵ ┻━┻

(ᕗ ͠° ਊ ͠° )ᕗ [dolphussy]

[-] bitofhope@awful.systems 8 points 1 year ago

A bit of a tangent but I loathe the Chesterton's fence argument. Not only does it shift the burden of proof to proving a negative ("show me this thing is not actually beneficial") but it straight up demands you to make the conservative argument for them. Before you get rid of this bad thing, please demonstrate your understanding of why it's good actually!

[-] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

I find it's a great way to figure out who to immediately stop listening to.

[-] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 1 year ago

a cursed idea I just had: chesterton's fence is the engine of sealioning

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
123 points (99.2% liked)

TechTakes

1480 readers
324 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS