Labour grassroots back Starmer’s new stance on gender, allies claim after poll (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 year ago by GreyShuck@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Allies of Keir Starmer claim he has the backing of Labour’s grassroots over his stance on sex- and gender-based rights after a new poll of members suggested they support the party’s updated position on the issue.

The party shifted its stance in the summer, abandoning its support for self-identification – which would allow people to legally change gender without a medical diagnosis. It announced the move alongside support for making the process of obtaining a gender recognition certificate far simpler and less invasive, as well as continuing to ensure some single-sex services and places could only be accessed by biological women.

While the issue remains a controversial one within the party, Labour Together, a group closely associated with Starmer, said a new YouGov poll of Labour members it commissioned showed broad support for the leadership’s new line.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

when the tory voters all go back to the tories and the media turns on starmer once he's in power, what is he going to do after he got rid of anyone even remotely left in labour?

if he even gets a majority next election, i'd wager his government lasts less than a year before it collapses at which point the blue tories will get back in and be even more draconian and right wing

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023

17 points (94.7% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers

168 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk