366
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 87 points 11 months ago

This is why we have no honesty in politics.

For fucks sake. He's trying to do everything he can to alert the country their democracy is in grave danger to the point of admitting he wouldn't still be there if he didn't think he had the best chance of stopping Trump.

And at the sidelines we have endless hand-wringing about his age and calls for a better candidate.

THEY ARENT STEPPING UP BECAUSE THEY AGREE BIDEN HAS THE BEST CHANCE.

Everyone complains the Democrats suck at messaging and then bitch about everything they say and do, even when it's honest, straightforward, and easy to understand.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 19 points 11 months ago

THEY ARENT STEPPING UP BECAUSE THEY AGREE BIDEN HAS THE BEST CHANCE.

This is not at all the only conclusion one would draw from an incumbent president not drawing challengers. Incumbent challenges usually cause division and a divided party may be in a worse place than a party unifying around a bad candidate. If Biden decides to run, we're pretty much stuck with him.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That is kinda fair.

I am totally dismissing both Cornell West* (thanks for the correction) and Robert Kennedy Jr because of their third party runs in this environment, and anyone else wanting to challenge Biden would need to make a very solid case that they are a better pick.

It's worth saying I wanted Bernie. I don't think even trying to pivot to him would be a good idea.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 10 points 11 months ago

Also RFK is batshit.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Cory Booker

I don't think this is who you meant. Cornell West maybe?

I think we're stuck with Biden. We'd be in a better place if he'd had some humility and announced he wasn't going to run again so we could have a primary with worthy candidates in it, but he didn't, so here we are.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah, him, and thanks for the correction. It's late, I'm tired and obviously cranky.

Also agreed, but he would have needed to say that four years ago and honestly, that move to have everyone else step aside back then so Biden could get the nomination destroyed the credibility of every one of those younger candidates.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 11 months ago

To be clear, I’m fine with him and his age, I just think the minimal quote that will inevitably be amplified may be too useful for the hand-wringers and GOP.

[-] Pronell@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

That's fair, but they'll also do that with anything he says while taking credit for his accomplishments.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 11 months ago

Oh of course, I wouldn’t expect anything less than their lowest.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Or, they could actually do more for the people.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Yeah because the NoVote crowd sure made that easy to accomplish letting the GOP back into the house.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It's a vicious cycle.

  • Democrats win but don't get a supermajority

  • People balk that they aren't doing anything and need to be taught a lesson to go further left

  • Republicans win the subsequent midterm because of poor turnout

  • The country gets dragged to the right, and people balk that Democrats aren't making things better or stopping them

  • Republicans win the presidency and Congress

  • People complain that it's Democrats faults because they didn't do anything to inspire them to vote

Withholding a vote to push Dems left would work if Republicans actually were basically the same. But because they're right wing extremists, all it accomplished is the opposite. The country moves right, not left.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I like how in your example the Republicans get to push the country right but the Dems cant push it left. Republicans are not winning super majorities every time they do things, and yet they get it done. There's a large monied wing of the Democrats that works as hard as the Republicans to block a lot of progress, and time and time again magic spoiler democrats come out of nowhere and theres always just enough of them, really curious how there's always just enough of those types to keep the rich donors safe.

Democrats do not want to do what they say they want to do as much as Republicans want to do what they say they want do.

[-] dx1@lemmy.world -5 points 11 months ago

"Our democracy" has been dead for a century. You guys are like rats running around a maze with your moronic "lesser of two evils" between two parties all controlled by the same interests.

this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
366 points (95.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2443 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS