80
Russia rigs ZNPP reactor buildings with explosives – AFU
(english.nv.ua)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
80 points (98.8% liked)
Ukraine
8205 readers
774 users here now
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
A NATO member will have to invoke Article 5, and NATO delegates will meet to discuss and vote on if it deserves NATO deployment. The annual summit in Lithuania is being held next week and Ukraine is expecting an invitation to join. What Russia is prepared to do if that happens... 🤷♀️
US Congress is trying to get the Commander-in-Chief (Biden) to go on record saying that blowing the power plant will trigger a NATO response, but US Congress isn't NATO's boss. It is pretty commonly accepted that unprovoked deployment of nuclear weapons by anyone anywhere (but especially by Russia in Ukraine) will trigger a NATO-led response.
The U.S. Senate is drafting a resolution for just that. They mentioned that there has already been an urging to have Biden's administration meet with NATO and EU allies to already prepare for the scenario, diplomatically and militarily.
Based on the willingness to make this public, I imagine that if radioactive fallout were to pollute an allies land, the war crys from Democrats and Republicans alike would force Biden's hand, as much as forcing the U.S. President does to force NATO. Regardless, Stoltenberg has made his beliefs well known to the point that I doubt he would even wait for a push from the U.S. if the situation occurs.