570
Just ruling questions
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
570 points (100.0% liked)
196
16243 readers
2397 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I mean, can someone really call themselves a "devil's advocate" if they're really just arguing for their own position that just happens to be unpopular with the people around them? My understanding was that the term was supposed to mean something more like arguing for a position that one disagrees with, to ensure that the arguments against that position hold up and strengthen them.
They won't actually say it's their position on issues unless they get enough support. It's pretending to play devil's advocate.
schrodingers advocate
It's more like a pseudo-devil's advocate. Someone who claims to just be arguing against a topic for the sake of making a point even though they don't agree, but actually doesn't agree with what you said.
Isn't the term, "playing devil's advocate"? Take out the 'playing' and all you have is a devils advocate.