421
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

National Retail Federation says 2021 data was flawed and based on congressional testimony from president of an advocacy group

The powerful National Retail Federation (NRF) lobbying group has retracted a claim that “organized retail crime” accounted for “nearly half” of the shopping industry’s $94.5bn losses due to theft or “shrink” in 2021.

The industry group had said the impact of organized retail crime, which it previously claimed had increased by 26.5%, had become increasingly violent. Retail giants like Target, Walmart and Walgreens said it was threatening their businesses.

The NRF said the figure was based on a congressional testimony from Ben Dugan, the former president of an advocacy group, the Coalition of Law Enforcement and Retail, and that an analyst from K2 Integrity, a risk consultancy that co-authored the report, inferred the “nearly half” claim.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] pl_woah@lemmy.ml 30 points 11 months ago

Writing to your representative is a form of lobbying

An unsolicited expert opinion is lobbying

What's messed up is the amount of money to run and that citizens united made unlimited funds possible

Congressmen always worried about the cash they'll need to get elected

If there were term limits we would have faceless corporate buyouts with little experience, vs someone running on name recognition

Heck I want a campaign finance max limit.

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately, term limits can't stop this.

Campaign finance reform can. Anyone running for office has a cap on how much can be spent. Political organizations also have a cap and they have to disclose who their donors are.

No more dark money.

I'd say we should go so far as to move to sortition (randomly selected people serving a term in office) but I am pragmatic.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I say we push all suffering and misery onto a single child and then live in the utopia that results.

[-] pl_woah@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

... That's what I just said. Are you a bot?

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I think I hit reply to the wrong parent message. But either way, I'm totally not a robot..........

[-] shunir@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm totally not a robot..........

That totally sounds like something robot would say though... :p

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago

An unsolicited expert opinion is lobbying

Right. Politicians know nothing about technology half the time, right?

Who does know - it’s people in the technology field.

They have to communicate somehow. Not saying it’s not broken today, and I think you could have a clever setup of advisors, but at the end of the day there will just have to be some kind of input by experts.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Let's just skip all the bullshit and move straight to direct voting.

It's been proven that congress doesn't follow the will of the people, anyways.

[-] RazorsLedge@lemmy.world -3 points 11 months ago

Paragraph salad, delicious

this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
421 points (99.1% liked)

News

23361 readers
3210 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS