96
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
96 points (92.9% liked)
Technology
59205 readers
2960 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It's a pretty clear violation of the 4th amendment. Won't stop companies from building this tech into their wireless headphones, though.
How's that working for defendants' these days? ~~Wasn't there a big case in Pennsylvania invalidating this in some sneaky way or something?~~
~~Something something Foregone conclusion doctrine~~
Nothing comes up when you search Pennsylvania + foregone conclusion. Unless you mean police making you give up passwords, which was deemed illegal by higher courts.
No but aren't there many exceptions to 4th and variably so? Its seems like its not so clear cut these days
No, 4th amendment is pretty cut and dried.
With the exception of Terry Stops.
Or maybe build it into some neat cowboy hats?