713

Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lots of people did vote for someone else in the 2020 primaries. This good variety of candidates that you claim existed only existed in the early rounds. Once Super Tuesday arrived, it was practically Bernie and Biden (everyone else was so far behind in vote percentages that they might as well not even been on the ballots). After Super Tuesday, the field narrowed even further to be exactly Bernie and Biden in the last remaining contests.

After Biden won South Carolina, and one day before the Super Tuesday primaries, several moderate candidates dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden in what was viewed as a consolidation of the party's moderate wing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries

So, why would someone vote for Biden over Bernie in these contests you're asking? It's simple; they liked Biden more than Bernie.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

It’s simple; they liked Biden more than Bernie.

Alright. Why did they like Biden more than Bernie?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's any number of reasons for that. I didn't like Biden at all but off of the top of my head:

  1. Bernie was painted in the media as a socialist / communist / big mean pinko that was going to start a revolution to cut all of the CEOs heads off
  2. Bernie was perceived as being as big of an extremist as Trump, just in a different direction
  3. Biden had previous government experience in the executive wing of government, and was something of a known quantity...this was comforting to some as people were exhausted by Trump and wanted to get back to some semblance of "normal"

I could go on further, but you should understand the themes here.

As an aside, despite not being overwhelmingly delighted with Biden's presidency, I am happy to not have the daily pants shitting, diaper-baby in the whitehouse headlines that we had during Trump's four years...and the competency with which Biden largely handled one of the only federal programs I cared about in 2020 (i.e. the distribution of COVID vaccinations) was refreshing after 4 years of complete and utter idiocy in the executive branch.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I could go on further, but you should understand the themes here.

Yes. The theme is "I don't like progressive or leftist candidates." They voted for Biden to fuck over our efforts. They are not our allies. They are fighting us out in the open.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

To just see every voter in the 2020 primary as being in the "anti-progressive" camp is to eliminate their possibility for them to change their mind.

We shouldn't throw them under the bus, but rather seek to persuade them to our side.

If you look at the first two (or somewhat all three) points I raised about why someone might vote Biden over Bernie they are basically based upon perception. Perceptions are moveable. People who voted for Biden in the 2020 primary aren't a lost cause. In many cases, they were persuaded by propaganda that they thought wasn't propaganda because it was coming from purportedly liberal sources (I think of MSNBC in particular).

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To just see every voter in the 2020 primary as being in the “anti-progressive” camp is to eliminate their possibility for them to change their mind.

I never said that. I said people voted for Biden specifically to fuck over progressives and leftists. Your own reasons why someone would choose Biden over every other candidate demonstrated this perfectly. You're right, not every voter in the 2020 primaries was a selfish piece of shit. But every person who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries was absolutely a selfish piece of shit.

Perceptions are moveable.

They have no incentive to move when their candidate wins the primary and the general elections.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

They have no incentive to move when their candidate wins the primary and the general elections.

I don't think that's 100% correct. Maybe some of the political insiders directly around Biden see Biden as "their guy"...many voters (myself included) do not see politicians as much of anything except a vehicle for the policies they want in government.

In my opinion, the incentive to move their views winds up being...reality unfolding before their eyes. You see the people in office now and what they're capable of, and you see what policy positions are and aren't working...and your perceptions about what is and isn't possible with certain policies, or certain politicians or even certain political parties...changes.

Hell, dude, the great progressive hope FDR wasn't exactly a leftist until he realized what a shitty shit burger of a situation the country was in when he took office. People and even politicians change.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I don’t think that’s 100% correct.

Clinton's presidency was 30 years ago. Biden is to the right of Clinton. We've moved precisely nowhere.

In my opinion, the incentive to move their views winds up being…reality unfolding before their eyes. You see the people in office now and what they’re capable of, and you see what policy positions are and aren’t working…and your perceptions about what is and isn’t possible with certain policies, or certain politicians or even certain political parties…changes.

Yes. In the form of losing general elections.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Clinton’s presidency was 30 years ago. Biden is to the right of Clinton. We’ve moved precisely nowhere.

Biden isn't to the right of Clinton no matter how much you want to keep insisting that's true.

But regardless of the Democrats the other party exists. Reagan was popular amongst basically everyone that voted, Democrats lost three general elections in a row which led to the advent of third way Democrats like Clinton in the first place. Biden losing will not lead to a more progressive candidate winning next election cycle. But it's very possible that it may lead us further toward fascism.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Biden isn’t to the right of Clinton no matter how much you want to keep insisting that’s true.

Lol prove it.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
713 points (95.1% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2322 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS