538
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Well you can't really have evidence on something that is opinion from first hand experience.

The reason I disagree with them is that the majority of these dogs are going to spend a year or more essentially locked in a medium security dog prison before being put down because they were never suitable for readoption in the first place but you've got to play the game before they can be put down or wait for them to bite one of the handlers.

I agree, money would solve the entire problem but it's a struggling industry and I just don't see it happening anytime soon. Until it does, the no kill laws are hurting more animals than they save.

[-] greencactus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I understand. I'm living in Germany, so our laws also probably differ as well - but is there a law which permits that if a dog e.g. doesn't get adopted within a year, it may be euthasized? I thought that a "no killing" law is absolute and that an animal in a shelter never is allowed to be killed, no matter the circumstance.

[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

No kill at least in Australia means you can't put animals to sleep due to over capacity, time frame etc. The only time they can be put down is when they've attacked or are showing high signs of aggression and the behaviour assessor finds they aren't suitable for readoption.

At that point, it becomes a duty of care to put the animal down as it's cruel to keep it in a kennel for the rest of its life and it can't be trusted as a family pet.

[-] greencactus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I understand. I think you raise an interesting thought... I get where the law is coming from, but it also makes sense that the way it is treated now makes it so that dogs who would live their entire life in captivity only suffer more.

Thank you for your insight - I appreciate it and will think about it.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

You paint a picture but where is your data on most of the dogs being unsuitable?

[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

I don't need to provide anything to you. I have plenty of industry data that's not available to be shared, there's plenty of public data for my state, but unless you're in New South Wales, Australia - it will be irrelevant to you. This is a first world, world wide issue.

Go on to Google and search 'dog attack, seizure and euthanasia rates' for wherever you are, even better to specific pounds, animal facilities and rescues and do the math yourself.

Alternatively, go volunteer at your local shelter, you're very concerned about these animals and every shelter desperately needs more help. Go help first hand and tell me how many of those dogs you'd let in your house with your kids and your loved ones.

[-] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I do volunteer at my local animal shelter. I have plenty of data but I can't show it to you is pure nonsense.

[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Cool man, go fuck yourself.

this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
538 points (97.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
3603 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS