161
Donald Trump is at war with the Constitution's insurrection clause—just 2 sentences in an amendment added after the Civil War (fortune.com)
submitted 11 months ago by BobTheBoozer@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml
27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

"“If President Trump committed a heinous act worthy of disqualification, he should be disqualified for the sake of protecting our hallowed democratic system, regardless of whether citizens may wish to vote for him in Colorado,”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

Right, I don't agree that it should be a legal consequence.

I do however think it should be a moral consequence, a judgment visited on those who would cast such a ridiculous vote. The best way I've heard it termed, is that Trump isn't merely unqualified, he's unqualified squared, which is to say, if you think he's fit to be president, then you also aren't qualified.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

With votes being anonymous, I'm not sure who is going to provide any sort of moral consequence here. Those who support him likely mostly watch media that supports him. The government shouldn't have a say in morality, they deal in law.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
161 points (93.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7216 readers
131 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
pangyuehung@lemmy.ml
yogthos@lemmy.ml