237
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

If you’re thinking of sending back a disappointing gift you just received over the holidays, the return may bring even more disappointment.

Americans have grown accustomed to free returns, but a growing number of retailers are charging fees as returns squeeze retailers’ bottom lines.

Macy’s, Abercrombie, J. Crew, H&M and other companies have all added shipping fees for mail-in returns.

And it’s not just the big mall brands, either. Eighty-one precent of merchants are now charging a fee for at least some methods of returns, according to Happy Returns, a logistics company that specializes in returns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 127 points 10 months ago

You want to give people as reason to go back to brick and mortar shopping? Because this is how you get people to go back to brick and mortar shopping.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 116 points 10 months ago

The main issue is amazon and their insistence on allowing China to sell utter trash, knock offs, counterfeits, and lies.

Amazon used to require someone selling in the US to have a physical presence of at least like a small office building in the US in order to sell goods here. They got rid of that like 10 years ago and now you get bs brands like Liuxipon selling flashlights that are garbage with 300 fake 5 star reviews. Then if they get flagged enough or get enough real 1 star reviews, no problem. Now their company name is Lioxipan and they do it again.

Amazon turned itself into a trash heap.

[-] tonyn@lemmy.ml 40 points 10 months ago

We started shopping AliExpress instead of Amazon. At least you don't pay the high Amazon prices and are pleasantly surprised when something of decent quality arrives. Got the kids some flying spacemen drones. $1.99 each. They've been playing with them all day long. No complaints. AliExpress even refunded me on a few things that arrived broken, without having to return anything.

[-] margaritox@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

That’s exactly what I do because amazon basically sells the same stuff as aliexpress, only amazon insists on selling stuff in higher quantities to jack up prices.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Bigger quantities to up prices?

[-] margaritox@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

For example, let’s say I needed a clear container tube for something like lotion. And I only need one, or two. But definitely no more than 5.

Amazon will only sell something like 12 pieces for over $10, whereas on aliexpress, I’ll be able to purchase 1 or 2 for $0.33.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

$1 each. 3 for $5.

“I’ll take 3, but I want them individually.”

[-] margaritox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I understand that the cost per item is the same, but I simply don’t need that many bottles (or whatever it is).  So if I get the bundle, I’m spending more money to have more junk in my household. 

So basically, I’m paying more for the three items that I do need and end up with a bunch of leftover crap. This is not hypothetical. I still have a bunch of leftover stuff that I’m not using in my drawers from scenarios like these.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

Cheap until they get popular enough.

[-] tonyn@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago
[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

They've also went way up in pricing on a lot of their stuff.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

As if they wouldn't just charge a "restocking fee."

[-] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

I worked retail for 15 years, and the only time we charged a restocking fee was if we couldn’t sell it as new, and there was nothing wrong with it. If you returned it brand new, full refund. If you opened it and/or used it and decided to return it, 15% restocking fee. That seemed reasonable to me.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

If you can see the item in real life and compare it to other products before you buy, you're less likely to need to return it.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

That is what they want. Offer free returns in store, and people will go to their physical locations and also buy something else.

[-] HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s what kohl’s does in taking Amazon returns. They even give you a $5 store credit to sweeten the allure on your walk from the back of the store

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Not to mention the additional traffic it generates, good for the corporate machine at large

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 5 points 10 months ago

That real estate isn't gonna pay for itself! Won't you think of the shareholders?

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

No… I’m just going to use an online retailer who will do it free

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Hopefully that's exactly what happens. It would be less convenient for me, but it would be better overall.

[-] JimmyBigSausage@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Best Buy Brick and Mortar charges 15% restocking fee. Merry NOTmas!

this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
237 points (91.3% liked)

News

23268 readers
2961 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS