107

Xbox Slammed For AI-Generated Art Promoting Indie Games (kotaku.com)

submitted 11 months ago by simple@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

This is why we need a rule that if you incorporate your logo into AI art, your logo becomes public domain.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is technically already legal precedence in USA, copyright requires human expression and without sufficient human creative control in ML generated works they're effectively public domain

Edit: why downvotes?

https://www.96layers.ai/p/why-ai-generated-content-cant-be

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Yes, for the imagery itself, but their logo is still under trademark. What I’m saying is if you put your logo on AI generated imagery and release it to the public, you no longer own a trademark for your logo.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

That's not how courts are going to treat it. Public domain (lack of) licensing is not "infectious". Instead you can just cut out the trademark and reuse ML images because under current legal precedence they're in public domain but the trademark isn't

[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I understand that. I’m saying I want to change that.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago

Good luck with that

[-] danielbln@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Because... why?

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

I'm guessing so the maintainers of the AI don't have to worry about copyright when it uses the logo somewhere unexpected. But I'm curious what OP says.