1
submitted 1 year ago by troyunrau@lemmy.ca to c/futurism@lemmy.ca

I posit that even the utopian futures will require something like it to preserve the utopias. Defensive Democracy will eventually see it as a necessary evil. The questions become: when? where first and where last? etc.

Discuss :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

that [...] system you vaunt now can and WILL be turned against you

This is true of almost any institution if the checks and balances are broken. Courts are great, but kangaroo courts are terrible. Democracy is great, until it elects a dictator. Etc.

Just because we don't personally like an idea doesn't mean it is avoidable from the perspective of a civilization.

If you work on the assumption that it is unavoidable: what checks and balances make it palatable?

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Futurism

429 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss the ideas, developments, and technology that can and will shape the future of civilization.

Tenets:

(1) Concepts are often better treated in isolation -- eg: "what if energy became near zero cost?"
(2) Consider the law of unintended consequences -- eg: "if this happens, then these other systems fail"
(3) Pseudoscience and speculative physics are not welcome. Keep it grounded in reality.
(4) We are here to explore the parameter spaces of the future -- these includes political system changes that advances may trigger. Keep political discussions abstract and not about current affairs.
(5) No pumping of vapourware -- eg: battery tech announcements.

See also: !retrotechnology@lemmy.ca and !predictions@lemmy.ca

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS