112
submitted 10 months ago by Wanderer@lemm.ee to c/energy@slrpnk.net

For a country that people shat on a lot for closing their nuclear plants Germany is on the right track reducing their C02.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

The combined risk of posthumanity pollution and catastrophic failures makes it a no-go for a risk averse society. Germany is spatially a comparably small country with high population density, there is not really a place where you easily can say no one lives here for the next thousands of years.

La Hague and Sellafield are or were places of necessary production chain segments with high pollution danger and history.

Zaporishja shows how dangerous centralised power production can be.

PV and wind energy were politically advocated for in Germany (California as well btw) before they were cheap and mass produced and efficient, even or especially against nuclear energy.

Austria actually is somewhat of a success story with a similar history.

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
112 points (97.5% liked)

Green Energy

2201 readers
348 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS