4
Daily Discussion Thread: Sun 07 Jan 2024
(aussie.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)
Melbourne
1870 readers
51 users here now
This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.
The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.
Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)
Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
What's > 0? She's been replying like once every 12-15 hrs anyway. I'll probably give up if I don't hear back tonight. ๐โโ๏ธ
Is it worth texting one more time or just let it be?
The ball is in her court, which is very apt
"> 0" means greater than 0. Meaning if she was interested she would have replied with at least something.
As for the previous frequency, this only proves my point even more. Now that you are trying to make this "real" it's radio silence.
Personally I would do nothing. You've put the ball in her court and she's not returning the serve it seems (yes I made a tennis pun).
I personally wouldn't text her if it was me at this point. It's not worth your dignity.
Don't give up after one message. Especially since you had obvious rapport.... she wasn't talking to you for no reason.
Be prepared for it to be a sign she's not interest. But there's no reason to jump to conclusions yet.
Yeah we had a good conversation going. I just feel sad, why am I so invested in this?? Also, do you mean maybe leave her another message before giving up?
Don't message again. It makes you look desperate. Move on and if she gets back to you, great. If not, whatever.
Yeah, that's what I thought as well but was confused by Pilk's comment.