284
How Trump Taught America to Tolerate Brazen Corruption
(www.theatlantic.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
284 points (96.7% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3834 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Because he "won" an election, and holding him to account means holding others with elected power to account (even when it doesn't benefit other people in their party in other elections).
Partly because the idea of himself having to face any real consequences for his actions is, at this point in his life, actually literally inconceivable at many levels to him, having spent essentially his entire life conning people and breaking all kinds of laws all the time and never really suffering any serious drawback from this due to his enormous wealth and social privilege.
Also, partly due to him seriously believing that he has so much influence and so many fanatical supporters that he can rely on being easily able to whip them up into a frenzy to, you know, just do a coup for him and install him as dictator.
On a societal level, why isnt he hanging for treason yet?
He stacked many government positions that would be likely to be important in the actual legal mechanics of a treason conviction with his own corrupt cronies, and also has so many ardent supporters of himself personally that many of these supporters were elected to other powerful positions of government, and again he generally has so many violent and stupid supporters that an extremely credible threat of mass domestic terrorist violence exists should anything bad happen to dear leader.
We are talking about a person whose legal team recently argued, in court, that Trump, having been president, is actually legally able to order a special forces team to assassinate his domestic political rivals, and this is ok because there is a check and balance in the American political system of a president doing this, of being able to be tried and convicted by congress.
You know, congress, which is also comprised of many of his political rivals, who he is allowed to order assassinations of.