167
Pi-Hole or something else for network ad blocking? (lemmy.world)
submitted 10 months ago by plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
113 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've been aware of pi-hole for a while now, but never bothered with it because I do most web browsing on a laptop where browser extensions like uBlock origin are good enough. However, with multiple streaming services starting to insert adds into my paid subscriptions, I'm looking to upgrade to a network blocker that will also cover the apps on my smart TV.

I run most of my self hosted services on a proxmox server, so I'd like something that'll run as an LXC container or a VM. I'm also vaguely aware that various competing applications have come out since pi-hole first gained popularity. Is pi-hole still the best thing going, or are there better options?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 20 points 10 months ago

Pi-hole is great, but unfortunately ads in YouTube or other streaming services is not one of the things it blocks.

[-] HexagonSun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Glad I read this - all my other devices block ads perfectly well already, but was wondering if I could block YouTube ads on my Apple TV... I guess not!

[-] mgrimace@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If you’re comfortable self hosting you can use isponsorblocktv to block ads/sponsorship on YouTube on AppleTv and various smart TVs. I use this + Pi-Hole https://github.com/dmunozv04/iSponsorBlockTV

[-] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Your best bet is getting a platform your can sideload apps onto and running SmartTube

[-] greyskies@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Not sure of any downside yet but setting your country to Albania via vpn removes all YouTube ads on Apple TV. Was just informed of this yesterday and as mentioned there may be reasons to not do this.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 10 months ago

PiHole and similar services just use DNS blocking, which only works if the ads are served via a third-party ad server. Sites with their own ad inventory (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc) can't be blocked this way since they can just serve the ads from the same domain as their regular content.

[-] dontblink@feddit.it 1 points 10 months ago

I wonder why we don't have AI browser extensions that can recognise and obscure possible ads / unwanted content yet

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Because the AI isn't needed, and would be computationally expensive.

Extensions like ublock origin and sponsorblock work just fine.

[-] HerzogVonWiesel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Simple: That would be the opposite of making money for companies

this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
167 points (96.6% liked)

Selfhosted

40313 readers
285 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz